<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
         xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
         xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
         xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">
<channel rdf:about="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing">

    <title>Free Software Foundation - GPL Compliance and Licensing</title>
  <link>http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing</link>
  <description>Details on the activites of the GPL Compliance Lab, and writing related to questions about licensing.
</description>
  <image rdf:resource="logo.jpg"/>
  <sy:updatePeriod>daily</sy:updatePeriod>
  <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
  <sy:updateBase>2005-01-05T20:18:49Z</sy:updateBase>
  <items>
    <rdf:Seq>
        
          
            <rdf:li resource="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/2008-02-12-logos"/>
          
          
            <rdf:li resource="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/2007-11-29-lawsuits"/>
          
          
            <rdf:li resource="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/2007-10-23-irc-reminder"/>
          
          
            <rdf:li resource="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/2007-10-18-gplv3-fud"/>
          
          
            <rdf:li resource="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/2007-09-28-irc"/>
          
          
            <rdf:li resource="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/2007-08-29-hypervisors"/>
          
          
            <rdf:li resource="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/2007-05-08-fdl-scope"/>
          
          
            <rdf:li resource="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/2007-03-29-gplv3-saas"/>
          
          
            <rdf:li resource="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/2007-03-29-gplv3-faq"/>
          
          
            <rdf:li resource="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/2007-03-28-gplv3-grandfather"/>
          
          
            <rdf:li resource="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/gplv3-lockdown"/>
          
          
            <rdf:li resource="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/call-for-volunteers"/>
          
          
            <rdf:li resource="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/compliance-situations"/>
          
          
            <rdf:li resource="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/drm-evil"/>
          
          
            <rdf:li resource="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/assignunisrule.html"/>
          
          
            <rdf:li resource="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/gplv3-tc-voting-machines"/>
          
          
            <rdf:li resource="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/gplv3-fda"/>
          
          
            <rdf:li resource="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/gplv3-drm"/>
          
          
            <rdf:li resource="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/quagga"/>
          
          
            <rdf:li resource="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/nopanicing"/>
          
          
            <rdf:li resource="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/20050425novalis"/>
          
          
            <rdf:li resource="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/20050325novalis.html"/>
          
          
            <rdf:li resource="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/20050324tedt.html"/>
          
          
            <rdf:li resource="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/freeasinbombs"/>
          
          
            <rdf:li resource="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/20050211.html"/>
          
        
   </rdf:Seq>
  </items>
</channel>



  <item rdf:about="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/2008-02-12-logos">
  <title>New license logos</title>
  <link>http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/2008-02-12-logos</link>
  <description>Let users know they're protected by GNU licenses.</description>
  <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
  <dc:creator>brett</dc:creator>
  <dc:rights></dc:rights>
  <dc:date>2008-02-12T16:26+00:00</dc:date>
  </item>




  <item rdf:about="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/2007-11-29-lawsuits">
  <title>GPL Compliance Lawsuits</title>
  <link>http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/2007-11-29-lawsuits</link>
  <description></description>
  <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
  <dc:creator>brett</dc:creator>
  <dc:rights></dc:rights>
  <dc:date>2007-11-29T13:43+00:00</dc:date>
  </item>




  <item rdf:about="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/2007-10-23-irc-reminder">
  <title>Compliance Lab Q&amp;A Oct. 24</title>
  <link>http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/2007-10-23-irc-reminder</link>
  <description></description>
  <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
  <dc:creator>brett</dc:creator>
  <dc:rights></dc:rights>
  <dc:date>2007-10-23T10:43+00:00</dc:date>
  </item>




  <item rdf:about="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/2007-10-18-gplv3-fud">
  <title>Busting GPLv3 FUD</title>
  <link>http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/2007-10-18-gplv3-fud</link>
  <description></description>
  <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
  <dc:creator>brett</dc:creator>
  <dc:rights></dc:rights>
  <dc:date>2007-10-18T17:12+00:00</dc:date>
  </item>




  <item rdf:about="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/2007-09-28-irc">
  <title>First IRC meeting wrapup</title>
  <link>http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/2007-09-28-irc</link>
  <description></description>
  <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
  <dc:creator>brett</dc:creator>
  <dc:rights></dc:rights>
  <dc:date>2007-10-11T16:58+00:00</dc:date>
  </item>




  <item rdf:about="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/2007-08-29-hypervisors">
  <title>Hypervisors a no-op for GPLv3 compliance</title>
  <link>http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/2007-08-29-hypervisors</link>
  <description></description>
  <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
  <dc:creator>brett</dc:creator>
  <dc:rights></dc:rights>
  <dc:date>2007-08-29T11:38+00:00</dc:date>
  </item>




  <item rdf:about="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/2007-05-08-fdl-scope">
  <title>What counts as a "modification" under the FDL?</title>
  <link>http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/2007-05-08-fdl-scope</link>
  <description></description>
  <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
  <dc:creator>brett</dc:creator>
  <dc:rights></dc:rights>
  <dc:date>2007-05-08T15:10+00:00</dc:date>
  </item>




  <item rdf:about="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/2007-03-29-gplv3-saas">
  <title>GPLv3 and Software as a Service</title>
  <link>http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/2007-03-29-gplv3-saas</link>
  <description></description>
  <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
  <dc:creator>brett</dc:creator>
  <dc:rights></dc:rights>
  <dc:date>2007-03-29T21:16+00:00</dc:date>
  </item>




  <item rdf:about="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/2007-03-29-gplv3-faq">
  <title>GPLv3 FAQ now available</title>
  <link>http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/2007-03-29-gplv3-faq</link>
  <description></description>
  <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
  <dc:creator>brett</dc:creator>
  <dc:rights></dc:rights>
  <dc:date>2007-03-29T20:30+00:00</dc:date>
  </item>




  <item rdf:about="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/2007-03-28-gplv3-grandfather">
  <title>GPLv3: A grandfather clause, but not for Novell</title>
  <link>http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/2007-03-28-gplv3-grandfather</link>
  <description></description>
  <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
  <dc:creator>brett</dc:creator>
  <dc:rights></dc:rights>
  <dc:date>2007-03-28T15:06+00:00</dc:date>
  </item>




  <item rdf:about="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/gplv3-lockdown">
  <title>It's not just TiVo locking down their hardware</title>
  <link>http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/gplv3-lockdown</link>
  <description>More and more devices require that their firmware be signed.</description>
  <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
  <dc:creator>brett</dc:creator>
  <dc:rights></dc:rights>
  <dc:date>2006-11-10T15:53+00:00</dc:date>
  </item>




  <item rdf:about="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/call-for-volunteers">
  <title>I want you to help answer licensing questions</title>
  <link>http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/call-for-volunteers</link>
  <description>The Compliance Lab could use a few good volunteers.</description>
  <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
  <dc:creator>brett</dc:creator>
  <dc:rights></dc:rights>
  <dc:date>2006-10-11T15:45+00:00</dc:date>
  </item>




  <item rdf:about="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/compliance-situations">
  <title>Every situation is different</title>
  <link>http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/compliance-situations</link>
  <description>How does the Compliance Lab work?  Well....</description>
  <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
  <dc:creator>brett</dc:creator>
  <dc:rights></dc:rights>
  <dc:date>2006-10-10T13:10+00:00</dc:date>
  </item>




  <item rdf:about="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/drm-evil">
  <title>Yes, DRM is inherently evil</title>
  <link>http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/drm-evil</link>
  <description>People keep saying DRM isn't inherently evil.  Why?</description>
  <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
  <dc:creator>brett</dc:creator>
  <dc:rights></dc:rights>
  <dc:date>2006-09-29T18:02+00:00</dc:date>
  </item>




  <item rdf:about="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/assignunisrule.html">
  <title>Assignment University</title>
  <link>http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/assignunisrule.html</link>
  <description>Sometimes universities don't know what's good for them</description>
  <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
  <dc:creator>jacobson</dc:creator>
  <dc:rights></dc:rights>
  <dc:date>2006-09-19T13:01+00:00</dc:date>
  </item>




  <item rdf:about="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/gplv3-tc-voting-machines">
  <title>GPLv3 and Voting Machines</title>
  <link>http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/gplv3-tc-voting-machines</link>
  <description>GPLv3 doesn't break voting machines.</description>
  <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
  <dc:creator>novalis</dc:creator>
  <dc:rights></dc:rights>
  <dc:date>2006-08-14T18:32+00:00</dc:date>
  </item>




  <item rdf:about="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/gplv3-fda">
  <title>Regulatory compliance is no reason to lock up users</title>
  <link>http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/gplv3-fda</link>
  <description>Why GPLv3 doesn't make exceptions for regulatory compliance.</description>
  <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
  <dc:creator>novalis</dc:creator>
  <dc:rights></dc:rights>
  <dc:date>2006-06-30T16:08+00:00</dc:date>
  </item>




  <item rdf:about="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/gplv3-drm">
  <title>Reaction to the DRM clause in GPLv3</title>
  <link>http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/gplv3-drm</link>
  <description>GPLv3's anti-DRM section solves an actual problem.</description>
  <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
  <dc:creator>novalis</dc:creator>
  <dc:rights></dc:rights>
  <dc:date>2006-03-07T18:03+00:00</dc:date>
  </item>




  <item rdf:about="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/quagga">
  <title>Quagga - The Free Software Directory</title>
  <link>http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/quagga</link>
  <description>As is so often the case in life, two steps forward requires one step back.  </description>
  <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
  <dc:creator>tedt</dc:creator>
  <dc:rights></dc:rights>
  <dc:date>2006-02-24T17:26+00:00</dc:date>
  </item>




  <item rdf:about="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/nopanicing">
  <title>Employers: Don't Panic!</title>
  <link>http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/nopanicing</link>
  <description>Employers are lucky to have employees ethical enough to care about assigning their code to the Free Software Foundation.</description>
  <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
  <dc:creator>jacobson</dc:creator>
  <dc:rights></dc:rights>
  <dc:date>2006-02-17T15:52+00:00</dc:date>
  </item>




  <item rdf:about="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/20050425novalis">
  <title>Font Licensing</title>
  <link>http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/20050425novalis</link>
  <description>By David "Novalis" Turner</description>
  <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
  <dc:creator>novalis</dc:creator>
  <dc:rights></dc:rights>
  <dc:date>2005-04-25T18:08+00:00</dc:date>
  </item>




  <item rdf:about="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/20050325novalis.html">
  <title>The Basics</title>
  <link>http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/20050325novalis.html</link>
  <description>The basics about copyright and licensing</description>
  <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
  <dc:creator>novalis</dc:creator>
  <dc:rights></dc:rights>
  <dc:date>2005-03-25T16:57+00:00</dc:date>
  </item>




  <item rdf:about="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/20050324tedt.html">
  <title>Digging the Value of Source </title>
  <link>http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/20050324tedt.html</link>
  <description>An example of why we need to know the reach of our intellectual interests.</description>
  <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
  <dc:creator>tedt</dc:creator>
  <dc:rights></dc:rights>
  <dc:date>2005-03-24T10:59+00:00</dc:date>
  </item>




  <item rdf:about="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/freeasinbombs">
  <title>Free as in bombs</title>
  <link>http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/freeasinbombs</link>
  <description>Linking to GPL libraries and freedom.</description>
  <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
  <dc:creator>novalis</dc:creator>
  <dc:rights></dc:rights>
  <dc:date>2005-03-04T17:43+00:00</dc:date>
  </item>




  <item rdf:about="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/20050211.html">
  <title>Censorship envy and licensing</title>
  <link>http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/20050211.html</link>
  <description>Why we don't have political terms in our licenses (even for really important issues).
</description>
  <dc:publisher>No publisher</dc:publisher>
  <dc:creator>root</dc:creator>
  <dc:rights></dc:rights>
  <dc:date>2005-02-11T11:00+00:00</dc:date>
  </item>



</rdf:RDF>



